Evaluation of Geodiversity Capabilities for Ground Protection (Case Study: Nourabad Mamasani Watershed, Fars Province, Iran)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistance Professor of GIS & RS, Firouzabad higher education center, Shiraz university of technology, Fars, Iran

2 Postdoctoral student, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

10.22034/rsgi.2025.66370.1125

Abstract

Objective: Geodiversity is a fundamental term for determining the importance of nature's abiotic resources, therefore, the expansion of studies related to geodiversity is of great importance, especially in Iran.With its karstic landforms, Fars Province possesses numerous geomorphodiversity capabilities. Accordingly, the aim of the present study is to investigate the geodiversity of the Noorabad Mamasani watershed in the west of Fars province, which is located in the geographical area of 51o 15/ to 51o 46/ east longitude and 29o 55/ to 30o 17/ north latitude. It has unique features such as waterfalls, caves, narrow gorges, karst valleys and natural arches, etc.
Methods: In order to evaluate geodiversity potentials of the study area, we used geodiversity index (GDI), per-area roughness density (PRD), Simpson’s evenness index (SIEI), Shannon’s evenness index (SHEI), Shannon’s diversity index (SHDI), Simpson’s diversity index (SIDI), roughness density, modified Simpson’s diversity index (MSIDI), and modified Simpson’s evenness index (MSIEI).
Results: Results of GDI, PRD, SHDI, SIEI, SIDI, SHEI, MSIDI, and MSIEI in Unit 1 (i.e., Tang-e-Buan) were found to be maximal (i.e., equal to 12.7, 0.031, 1.56, 0.76, 0.87, 0.84, 1.5, and 0.93, respectively). Unit 3 in the western part of the watershed finished second while Units 2 and 4 were ranked 3rd and 4th, respectively.
Conclusions: The value of GFI in the central, western, and northern parts of the study area was evaluated at about 9.11, 11.04, and 7.5, respectively. That is, as one moves from the south to the north, the geodiversity decreases.

Keywords

Main Subjects

تنوع زمین یک اصطلاح اساسی برای تعیین اهمیت منابع غیر زنده طبیعت است از این رو گسترش مطالعات مرتبط با ژئودایورسیتی به خصوص در ایران از اهمیت فراوانی برخوردار است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی ژئودایورسیتی حوضه آبریز نورآباد ممسنی در غرب استان فارس می‌باشد که در محدوده جغرافیایی /15، o51 تا /46، o 51 طول شرقی و /55، o29 تا /17، o30 عرض شمالی واقع شده است. که دارای عوارض منحصر به فرد مانند آبشار، غار، لاپیه تنگ، دره‌های کارستی و طاق طبیعی و.... می‌باشد. در این پژوهش به منظور ارزیابی پتانسیل‌های ژئودایورستی منطقه از شاخص ژئودایورسیتی سرانو و فلانو GDI، شاخص‌های تراکم ناهمواری هر قطعه (PRD)، ضریب همواری سیمپسون (SIEI)، ضریب همواری شانون (SHEI)، ضریب دایورسیتی شانون (SHDI)، ضریب دایورسیتی سیمپسون (SIDI)، تراکم ناهمواری‌ها،  (MSIDI)شاخص اصلاح شده تنوع سیمپسون، (MSIEI) شاخص اصلاح شده همواری سیمپسون استفاده گردید. نتایج حاصل از شاخص‌های GDI، PRD، SHEI، SHDI، SIDI، SIEI MSIDI MSIEI در واحد (1) (تنگ بوان) بالاترین ارزش را به خود اختصاص داده است و به ترتیب برابر است با 7/12، 031/0، 56/1، 76/0، 87/0، 84/0، 50/1، 93/0. واحد (3) بخش غربی حوضه در رتبه دوم قرار دارد و واحدهای 2 و 4 در رتبه‌های سوم و چهارم قرار دارند. مقدار GFI در بخش مرکزی، غربی و شمالی منطقه مورد مطالعه به ترتیب حدود 11/9، 04/11 و 5/7 ارزیابی شد. یعنی با حرکت از جنوب به شمال از تنوع زمین کاسته می‌شود.

Brilha, J. (2016). Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: A Review Geoheritage, The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage, pp. 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3.
Carrión-Mero, P., JDueñas-Tovar, M., Jaya-Montalvo, E., Berrezueta, N., Orellana, J. (2022). Geodiversity assessment to regional scale: Ecuador as a case study, Environmental Science & Policy, Volume 136, pp. 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.009.
Dowling, R. (2011). Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage. 3, p.p 1–13.
Fassoulas, C. D., Mouriki, P., Dimitriou-Nikolakis, Iliopoulos, G. (2012). Quantitative Assessment of Geotopes as an Effective Tool for Geoheritage Management, Geoheritage Journal, 4, pp. 177-193 DOI:10.1007/s12371-011-0046-9.
Ghoohrodi, Tali., Manijeh, Khadijah., Ali, Nouri. (2022). Application of geodiversity in environmental management (case study of Karaj dam upstream basin, quantitative geomorphology researches. (in Persian).
Goli Mokhtari, L., Biramali, F. (2017). Calculation and analysis of terrestrial diversity (geodiversity) (case study: Eshtehard city), Natural Geography Research, pp.307-322. (in Persian).
Gray, M. (2011). Other nature: geodiversity and geosystem services. Environ. Conserv, 38, pp.271–274.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000117.
Gray, M. (2018). Geodiversity: The Backbone of Geoheritage and Geoconservation. In: Reynard, E., Brilha, J. (Eds.), Geoheritage. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 13–25.
Kuleta, M. (2018). Geodiversity research methods in geotourism. Geosci 8. https://doi. org/10.3390/geosciences8060197.
Lopez, ´ S., Sierra, R. (2010). Agricultural change in the Pastaza River basin: a spatially explicit model of native Amazonian cultivation. Appl. Geogr. 30, 355–369. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.004
McGarigal, K., Cushman, SA., Neel, MC., Ene, E. (2002). FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computersoftware program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts: Amherst.
Nasiri, A., Shafiei, N., Zandi, R. (2022). Evaluation of Geodiversity Across Noorabad Basin (Fars Province, Iran). Geoheritage 14, 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-0075.
Pereira, D.I., Pereira, P., Brilha, J., Santos, L. (2013). Geodiversity assessment of Parana ´ State (Brazil): an innovative approach. Environ. Manag. 52, 541–552. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00267-013-0100-2.
Salehipour, A. Milani., Sadouq, H., Rafiei, R. (2022). Geodiversity assessment of watersheds overlooking Namak Lake and Sultan Pond, Quantitative Geomorphological Researches, 10th year, number two, 38, pp. 84-105. (in Persian).
Scammacca, O., Bétard, F., Aertgeerts, G. (2022).  Geodiversity Assessment of French Guiana: Challenges and Implications for Sustainable Land Planning. Geoheritage 14, 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00716-6.
Serrano, E., Ruiz-Flano, P. (2007). Geodiversity: a theoretical and applied concept. Geographica Helvetica 62(3):140-147. DOI:10.5194/gh-62-140-2007
Shafiei, N., Nasiri, A., Nowrozi, S., Shah Pasandi, M. (2023). Investigating the role of geo-diversity in the development of tourism in Firozabad, Journal of Tourism Space, Volume 11, Number 43, pp. 117-130.
Shayan Yeganeh, A.A., Zanganeh Asdi, M. A., Amir Ahmadi, A. (2018). Quantitative Geodiversity Evaluation of the Proposed Geopark of West Khorasan Razavi for the Protection of its Geological Heritage, Space Geographic Survey, Volume: 10, Number: 36, 99-70. (in Persian).
Sistani, M., Nagaresh, H., Fatuhi, S., Ramsht, M., H, Raushit, M. (2019). Investigating the difference of geodiversity and geomorphodiversity in the coastal region of the Oman Sea and the Makran zone from Cape Jask to the Gulf of Gwatar, Geography and Development, No. 63, 52-31. (in Persian).
Sleszy ´ nski, ´ P., Solon, J. (2017). A map of the landscape diversity of Poland. Geogr. Pol. 90, 369–377. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0100.
Warowna, J., Zgłobicki, W., Grzegorz Gajek, Małgorzata, T., Kołodyńska, R., P, Zieliński. (2014). Geomorphpsite asissment in The proposet geopark vistula river gap quaestion Geographec 33(3), pp. 173-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2014-0040.
Zwoliñski, Z. (2010). The routine of landform geodiversity mapdesign for the Polish Carpathian Mts. Landform Analysis 11: pp 77–85.
Volume 5, Issue 17
February 2026
Pages 63-50
  • Receive Date: 13 March 2025
  • Revise Date: 10 April 2025
  • Accept Date: 12 December 2025